When I first
started this blog I did a post on how awesome the choice of RSS feeds on
ESPN.com is. While I still think ESPN
does have quite a collection of news feeds, there are some things about them
that aren’t so awesome.
One of those
things is the lack of comprehensiveness of the ESPN's catalog of RSS feeds, which is titled “RSS Index."
Go to this index
and you’ll be met with a paragraph that begins, “Below is a list of most of the
news (or “RSS”) feeds that ESPN.com offers.”
Also, the sentence with the link to this page calls the index
“complete.”
Give me a break.
Lots of ESPN’s
RSS feeds aren’t included in this “complete” appendix.
There are feeds
for the five ESPN Cities, none of which are listed on the allegedly complete
RSS page.
I found a feed for Peyton Manning recently, and discovered feeds for Tim Tebow and for the
Baltimore Ravens in completing this blog post.
How many of those three RSS feeds are included on ESPN’s “complete”
list? Zero.
Here's a screen shot of ESPN New York, where Tim Tebow is everywhere. But his RSS feed isn't listed on ESPN's RSS page. |
Now it’d probably be a little ridiculous to think ESPN could have a single page that listed every single news feed one might
subscribe to via their website.
I’m pretty sure
there are tons of news feeds on ESPN.com. I typed “Brandon Bing” into
the search bar on ESPN.com, and even he has
his own RSS feed....
You don’t know
who Brandon Bing is, do you? That’s
exactly my point.
But still, how
can you call a directory of RSS feeds “complete” if it’s missing feeds of guys
like Peyton Manning and Tim Tebow?
They’re both major NFL stars who have been extra newsworthy lately
(though they might not be quite as newsworthy by the time I finish writing this
post…it’s taking me too long).
And though it would still be
relatively easy to subscribe to Manning’s and Tebow’s feeds, or to find info on either of the athletes in some other way, it would certainly make life easier for sports
fans if ESPN.com listed more of the newsworthy RSS feeds on its RSS feed page.
Am I alone in my
thoughts here, or do I have a point?
No comments:
Post a Comment